“Logic Reasoning and Ideological Characteristic of ‘Equivalence of Life and Death’ of Chuang-Tzu”, Theory Horizon 256(6), 2017.
吴迪. 庄子“齐生死”的逻辑理路及其思想特质,《理论界》,2017年第6期。
Abstract: The Concept of Life and Death of Chuang-tzu have inherited and developed Confucianism and Taoism thoughts, establishing Ontological foundation of "Life - Body", distinguishing the transcendental concept of "Dead Heart" and the empirical concept of "Death Body", as well as proposing the thought of "Equivalence of Life and Death" finally. The logic Reasoning of Chuang-tzu "Equivalence of Life and Death", start from constructing the equal status of "Life" and “Death" from ontological argument. Life and Death then are reduced to be a natural phenomenon to dispel its mystery. With emphasizing the social connotation of life and death, the difference between them has been removed, and finally the Thought experiment of "Chuang-tzu dreaming butterfly" has deepen the idea of "Equivalence of Life and Death". The Ideological Characteristic of the Concept of Life and Death of Chuang-tzu mainly reflects in the aspects of Ontology, Epistemology and Ethical practice.
“Aristotelian Distributive Justice: Holism or Egalitarianism? ”, Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Philosophy and Social Science Edition] 376(6), 2017.
Abstract: Different understanding on Aristotelian distributive justice results in two main factions: holism and egalitarianism. Dennis McKerlie, one of the representatives of holism, criticized Martha Nussbaum's interpretation as an egalitarian. McKerlie argued that Nussbaum did not attach enough importance to the Proportional equality and Aristotelian Common good, as well as a deviation in the understanding of the concept of distribution. The defense of egalitarianism is that Aristotle's emphasis on the rational equality of citizens and the ontological presupposition of primal equality show Aristotelian egalitarian tendencies.
"From 'Modern Technology' Criticism to 'Future-oriented' Responsibility Ethics: Hans Jonas's Theoretical construction of Responsibility Ethics" Science Economy Society 36 (4):25-32 (2018)
Abstract: Hans Jonas 's responsibility ethics is an important achievement of modern technology criticism and ethical theory innovation. The maturity of Jonas's ethical thought has gone through three main stages, namely, the critique of modern technology, the reflection of traditional ethics and the construction of the " Future-oriented " Responsibility Ethics. Jonas's criticism of modern technology not only has a strong epochal character but also carries on the spirit of social criticism since Marx. His insight into the traditional ethics theory and the ethical characteristics of the technical age constituted the background of the Responsibility ethics. Jonas's responsibility ethics is not only the return of "responsibility" spirit in ethics but also the dimension of "Future", which is the characteristic of his theory. Through criticism, reflection and construction, Jonas formed this kind of asymmetrical ethics thought of "Future-oriented" Responsibility and faced the challenge of modern technology.
“Moral Courage: Classification and Interpretation”, forthcoming 吴迪. 道德勇气刍议,《齐鲁学刊》,已录用,2018年即将刊发。
Edited books
Chinese Social Morality Development Research Report (2015), co-edited with Ge Chenhong, Shan Aihong (Beijing, P.R. China: Renmin University Press, 2016.)
Chinese Social Morality Development Research Report (2014), co-edited with Ge Chenhong. Jiang Chang, Dai Maotang, Li Jialian (Beijing, P.R. China: Renmin University Press, 2014)
Thesis
“On Hans Jonas’s ‘Responsibility for the Future’”, Thesis, Renmin University of China, 2016.
“A study of Operation model of C-NGO: Research on ‘One Foundation’”, Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2013.
“The Comparison between Plato and Aristotle on The Concept of State: Origin, Law and Form of State”, Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2013.